@LilVampiresLullaby13 Probably something like: bibbybibbibbibbydipdipdippydippydippydibbydibbydibddibbydibby dibby dibby dibby di di deb dibby dibby DIBBY DIBBY DIBBY DE DOO bebbe de deb deb bebby de? deb deb bebby debby debby debby debby de doo, bbu duh duh dup dup, bug duh duh dup dup budy dudy dibby dibby dibby de doo!!!
shuttle pippa middleton space shuttle discovery spacex ann romney tupac hologram tupac back
3:00 PM By Article Directory
'; div.innerHTML = summary; } //]]> Debt Settlement Negotiations - How Debt Settlement Negotiations Work Debt Settlement Negotiations - How Debt Settlement Negotiations WorkDebt Settlement Negotiations are one of the top most debt relief options which are hugely admired by debtors worldwide. Debt reduction Negotiations Work quickly and are the only way which works with your credit card company to reduce about half the amount of your outstanding liability.
The other option like debt consolidation consolidates the bills into a huge form of loan, but the entire loan remains the summation of all the accounts. Bankruptcy is the last option and it leaves borrowers with a black credit score for about ten years or more. But Debt Settlement Negotiations Work positively and is willingly accepted by your creditors. Debt reduction Negotiations helps in deducting about 50% of your entire outstanding amount through skillful negotiations between your hired settlement firm and your creditor. The financial professionals work and make agreements with your creditors on your behalf and try abolishing even your late fees. The Debt reduce Negotiations Work by decreasing consumer debt by about several grands and helps you in purging out of your liability in about 2 years time span.
There are certain parameters that you must definitely keep in mind while choosing a debt settlement company. You must at least take about two to three points into consideration before hiring a settlement firm. You must initially make clear that the money that you are saving for eradicating your debt must be kept aside in a trust account by your debt reduction company. Your settlement company must not control your money that must be saved in the trust account. A third party will look after your money but you must have the overall authority over it. Even before utilizing your money for your settlement payment, your hired negotiating firm must take your permission and go ahead if only you find the terms suitable.
When you hire a settlement firm, then they must handle your entire case and not drag it to a third party to handle what is left off the process. They must take full control over your case individually. Never go directly to a debt reduce firm, in fact you must initially take help from a debt relief network. These relief networks have a list of well reputed and lawful companies which are the best and reliable in the field.
Debt settlement companies are widely available in just about every state however some are just flat out more experienced than others in debt negotiation. That's why it's so important for consumers to use debt relief networks. These networks qualify and only accept the best performing debt settlement companies. To find a legitimate debt settlement company in your state check out the following link:
Free Debt Advice [http://www.freedebtsettlementadvice.com].
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mason_Lewis
Source: http://business-negotiation.blogspot.com/2012/07/debt-settlement-negotiations-how-debt.html
superbowl birmingham news lee evans lee evans 49ers 49ers vs giants giants vs 49ers
Being unable to find ?the word? is a frustrating concept whether writing or speaking, and a number of theories have been postulated in an attempt to elaborate on why this happens.
?The principle of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects the ways in which its speakers conceptualize their World, and I believe that this is a highly important view ? especially in light of the frequent expression ?I can?t put it into words!?.? Sometimes, when I am talking, I yearn for a more appropriate word in the context than ?sad?, but not to the infantile nature of ?upset? ? indeed, some languages have multiple terms with only slight differentiations for the same word. This in turn implies that those speaking and writing in one language, will hold a?differing?view upon the content?of?the text then those in another language. Yet the extent to which this is dependent on cultural context is debatable.?
?On the other hand, ?a relatively new way of approaching and dealing with language ?E-prime?, could appear to try and address this, as a form of the English language which is almost identical to the norm, yet omits the copula ? ?to be?. However, this reductionist approach expresses problems, especially to myself ? surely if we are facing difficulty saying what we mean, we need more words rather than fewer? The human faculties to be able to talk and write demonstrates amazing skill? human beings are the only creatures on the planet known to be able to speak a language which often involves the filtering of sensory experiences to an expression through sound. Yet sensory experiences often confuse us, and for example, some people wish that there was a more appropriate word to describe their emotional states. I am guilty, I admit, of ?inventing? my own words, as I feel this establishes a more unique?perspective?upon the World when I write. This technique is observable in many forms of writing, for example in Thomas Hardy?s poem ?The?Convergence?of The Twain?. Hardy coins the term ?thridding? in what composites an active, deep description of the sea. However, It is often the case in writing that emotional embodiment is dependent upon the empathy of the reader, for example, a line of haunting resonance for myself is in Sylvia Plath?s ?The Bell Jar? ? ?The face in the mirror looked like a sick Indian??, as?apparently?a description of?physical?factors.?
Language to describe emotional states highlights the issue I am attempting to explore ? the majority of the time I believe language is a descriptor, rather than the actual case per se ? language is the description, rather than the physical object ? and a subjective description, whether recording the person?s emotion, perception or memory at that time. As the artistic movement of expressionism suggested, ?incorporated so vividly in the artistic piece ?The scream? by Edward Munch, perhaps it is the meaning which lies in emotion ? and after physicality, the? closest expression may be language.
?I believe that the view of the linguistic ?object? being higher than the physical ?object? is somewhat contradictory and flawed ? I do admire the power of the word, but I?believe?that?we do need?experience?of context in order to decipher meaning.? For example those who scoff at physical pleasures and experiences compared to intellectual experiences, as the physical world and our experience seems to actually appropriate our language, considering the sapir-whorf hypothesis. The sapir-whorf hypothesis implies that experience, the world around us and hence factors such as culture, provide the foundations for the meanings of our language. The hypothesis argues that the thoughts of those who speak one language cannot be understood by one who speaks a different language. This theory is often regarded as ?difficult? as in turn implies that translations of texts will lack much, if not all of their original meaning -? not my growing horror in thinking ? am I reading Tolstoy, Sartre and Beauvoir in a flawed way? Initially, this did not settle well with me, ?considering?the argument of the ?linguist and semiotician Roman Jakobson who declared that ?poetry by definition is untranslatable? especially, as it could be?considered?that poetry, often a highly?personal?form, has?intrinsic?connections to the culture of origin. But, as can be still viewed today, it is these translated works which still often hold that classic quality ? they are forever in discussion, upon the tongue, and can hold personal meaning to the reader.
But then do we get even further away from the true literature, according to the hypothesis, when we incorporate into another form of language ? speech? Is it the case that speech?diverts?from meaning even more? This does?depend?on where ?meaning? is formulated and in this case, the meaning of the literature, if any, as time proceeds, could be moving farther and farther away. But how I see it, is this ? the time they were written and the contexts may be further away, but there?can still be explored some rather enthralling text relativity today, even if not all of the context is.
Any linguistic influence is now generally considered to be related not primarily to the formal systemic structures of a language but to cultural conventions and individual styles of us, an although the sapir-wharf hypothesis has perhaps helped to shape this, it is important to consider how we can face the difficulty of linguistic expression rather than just theorising it.
The world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds ? and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds. We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, we in turn attribute meaning to our language. But what is ?meaning? ? ?meaning? is content we seem to be able to understand, and ?understanding? is developed by the senses, the physical sense which in turn emphasize the importance of the physical experience just as much as the intellectual.
To apply this to literary movement , Romanticism rejected the ?cutting up? of nature so to speak, as is an ?environment? I feel highly comfortable within ? rather than implying limits of language to specifics as is somewhat the case in ?E-prime? such rather than shrinking language, goes beyond and uses the combination of human language and an external nature in order to appropriate powerful emotions for example. Works of literature, especially that of the Romantic Period at its peak at about 1840 I believe often avoid harsh reductionism of theory, as language may appear a harsh reduction of thought. This seems to allow for more personal interpretation.
Instead, especially in terms of poetry, Romanticism was a movement which embraced the creativity of imagination and power of emotion. I believe that meaning does not reside in a text but arises in its interpretation ? and interpretation is through use of the sensory faculty and involves human emotion,? perception and so on, hence the importance of aesthetics, as the Romantics implied in terms of often lengthy description of the beauty of nature. For example Shelley?s beautiful line from the poem ? A Summer Evening Churchyard, Lechlade, Gloucestershire? ? ??And pallid Evening twines its beaming hair/ In duskier braids around the languid eyes of Day? uses the personification of nature to compare such to the beauty almost of a woman?s hair entrancing the eye. In this way, it is perhaps language which can we seen as the ultimate personification of nature.
Factors such as ?beauty?, ?value? etc. are of course subjective, but in terms of a piece of literature this allows for the ever-lasting validity of the readers interpretation and my view that there should not be specific limits to language ? for example there is no specific ?right? or ?wrong?, ?good? or ?bad? from an ethical perceptive. To consider that in terms of the feature of a ?tree? in a poem for example one person may imagine a voluptuous oak tree in full leaf, whilst another may imagine a slender silver birch. Neither is wrong per se, or could be both wrong in terms of the poet themselves was picturing an entirely different tree! The implication is evident however; the subjectivity of emotive language holds an experience for each individual faculty of perception. For example in William Faulkner?s description of a deer ?Then the buck was there. He did not come into sight; he was just there, looking not like a ghost but as if all of light were condensed in him and he were the source of it, not only moving in it but disseminating it, already running??, for myself, the rhythm of this passage is thrilling and emphasizes?the?wild thrill of nature, whilst another person may interpret this description in a completely different sense.
Having taken?the?sapir-whorf?hypothesis?into?consideration?and that of linguistic relativity,?when?applied to Romantic literature,?the?issue, for myself, is much?subdued. What I love abut reading and writing, although ?it may be at times frustrating, is the subjective?opportunities?it offers and capacity for the?individual?to only realise others, but realise the processes of their own mind. As?prevalent?in the novel ?A?Clockwork?orange? were Nadsat, a type of Cant or Anti-language is?used?in an attempt to exclude wider social groups,?that?we, who are not one of group of ?Droogs? still read such today I?believe?reveals that in literature there is always?capacity?for both language and ourselves.?
Source: http://www.lancashirewritinghub.co.uk/2012/07/an-attempt-to-put-it-into-words-by-emily-oldfield/
dr seuss the temptations rush limbaugh sandra fluke green book some like it hot whale shark whale shark
RVIA President Richard Coon Signs CATARC agreement
The Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA) is reporting substantial progress in the trade organization?s efforts to facilitate the involvement of U.S. RV companies in the growth and development of the Chinese RV industry following a fourth trade mission to China.
According to a press release, RVIA President Richard Coon, RVIA Vice President and General Counsel Craig Kirby and RVIA Vice President of Standards and Education Bruce Hopkins visited Shanghai and Beijing June 19 to July 1 for a series of meetings with Chinese governmental agencies and other companies and organizations to discuss further establishing and growing the RV market within China.
One of the key achievements of the trip was the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between RVIA and the China Automotive Technology and Resource Center (CATARC) to work together on RV standards issues. As a technical administrative body in the auto industry and a technical support organization to the Chinese government, CATARC assists the government in such activities as auto and RV standards development and product certification testing.
The group met with RVIA in Beijing on June 24 to discuss the current voluntary minimal RV standard developed by CATARC and to receive a briefing from Hopkins on the NFPA 1192 standard.
?This Memorandum of Understanding with CATARC is a significant step toward developing a more formal RV standard for China that is harmonized with our North American standards, which would be a boost to U.S. RV manufacturers and suppliers interested in doing business in the Chinese RV market,? said Coon.
In other key meetings, RVIA met with:
? The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers to discuss RVIA?s role on a new RV committee formed by the organization.
? The China Ministry of Transport to discuss road use regulations pertaining to RVs.
? The Shanghai Tourism Administration to discuss their RV and campground projects and to visit a potential campground site.
China Travel Services, the country?s leading travel services provider which operates an expansive campground near Beijing (which RVIA toured), to explore how the company can work with RVIA and its member companies.
? China National Tourism Administration representatives who are planning to establish an RV association and would like for RVIA to participate.
?These were very productive meetings that allowed us to begin addressing some of the regulatory and market barriers limiting the involvement of U.S. companies in the Chinese RV market,? said Coon. ?We were also able to further develop relationships with key contacts to lay the groundwork for future efforts. And, we added to our knowledge of the Chinese RV market and business culture. It was a very successful trip.?
In addition, RVIA also met with foreign commercial services officers from the U.S. Embassy to enlist their support of RVIA?s efforts and scouted potential office locations while in Beijing.
?
![[Slashdot]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_u-Swb_99urdKLVXJFO5s2PBo5BMPyRkwf7LzCuYneqVhlMtwhSiLXfTmVb2qs41gmFdp9aQ2sUD-vt7ljBxpljJ8I=s0-d){kind=small}
![[Digg]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sxC7BDK2ZkRQk8RABfpYe61xeJ4Oc8_gwNptk1cF7b3nKmZOJkP3ncKMkSieb7GgczfSfwUdmzLgMFNad7bA=s0-d){kind=small}
![[Reddit]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vmN6TWW8rVhHj1266v37hcTmMcNfYBNum-KogPGKFbFdgVvZKJGMFCgRp5NJJVecpuCP7aqyTL7ea-xTeXxZSH=s0-d){kind=small}
![[del.icio.us]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tuymzoRwSWLqisdMSXFsB2qL8hjCjC3vzEm5SJyCmoT0I8FeEPVqXj3hUECx8PKXR_4NCjItVVaacG7wbRkYrg-U0PivhFSO-pIdWuTPVe149r8XYnctGzC5g=s0-d){kind=small}
![[Facebook]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vXtyAirVmWtIhSN1Bno2yUkwV_uE_dP8usMI2m6dtdUQ4nD0pXaIoVvU76SJRSbrqfu2NEqC3rQpQHZbD0pn_yTzoTM4E=s0-d){kind=small}
![[Technorati]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uoKNbIY1s3eOrMPtmjkEZd_wYxOAsrou4hpmuNe5UxCMHtZJ8rtpireK_AHdMH_xpX3hUIyWxZYTpLA-Ysj9QQIj5tGQ=s0-d){kind=small}
![[StumbleUpon]](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_s1P2SUMJ5JRtr0AKY3MpVy26arc6vI7gScvtE9wEL9UVo2YIiRnLMQqEsurkGitRO2KDqFeOdRHAAhApgtFz2Kly-DBfiRKlA=s0-d){kind=small}
Source: http://www.rvbusiness.com/2012/07/rvia-reports-china-trade-mission-successful/
baylor sofia vergara april 9 albatross louis oosthuizen phil mickelson 10 year old gives birth
Spain's King Juan Carlos, left, shakes hands with Economy Minister Luis de Guindos, right, prior to the Cabinet meeting at which sales tax hikes and spending cuts were approved at the Zarzuela Palace on the outskirts of Madrid, Friday, July 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Angel Diaz, Pool)
Spain's King Juan Carlos, left, shakes hands with Economy Minister Luis de Guindos, right, prior to the Cabinet meeting at which sales tax hikes and spending cuts were approved at the Zarzuela Palace on the outskirts of Madrid, Friday, July 13, 2012. (AP Photo/Angel Diaz, Pool)
Russian President Vladimir Putin, right, speaks to Spain's King Juan Carlos as he awards him with Russian State Award for humanitarian activism in 2010 in the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Thursday, July 19, 2012. (AP Photo/Alexander Zemlianichenko)
ARCHIVO- En esta foto de archivo de la familia real espa?ola del 12 de octubre de 2009, de izquierda a derecha: la princesa Letizia, el pr?ncipe Felipe, el rey Juan Carlos, la infanta Elena, la reina Sof?a, la infatan Cristina y su esposo I?aki Urdangar?in. La realeza europea han comenzado a hacer recortes en sus gastos ebido a la crisis econ?mica mundial. (AP foto/Arturo Rodriguez, Archivo)
MADRID (AP) ? The World Wildlife Fund's branch in Spain has ousted King Juan Carlos as its honorary president ? a title he'd held since 1968 ? after deciding his recent elephant hunting safari was incompatible with its goal of conserving endangered species.
The announcement Saturday was the latest in a string of bad news for Spain's royal family, which has been embarrassed by legal and other scandals.
The fund said in a statement that "although such hunting is legal and regulated" it had "received many expressions of distress from its members and society in general." It said members voted at a meeting Saturday in Madrid to "to get rid of the honorary President" by a substantial majority of 226 votes to 13.
The Royal Palace declined immediate comment on the announcement.
Many Spaniards were dumbfounded when news broke in April that the king had made a secret journey to hunt elephants in Botswana even though it was widely known he was president of the Spanish branch of the fund.
Such an opulent indulgence also angered Spaniards at a time when national unemployment hovers around 25 percent, the economy is contracting and there are fears the country may need an international financial bailout.
The Spanish public learned of the safari only after the king had to fly back in a private jet to receive emergency medical attention for a broken hip suffered during the trip.
In an unprecedented act of royal contrition, a sheepish Juan Carlos apologized, saying as he left the hospital: "I am very sorry. I made a mistake. It won't happen again."
It was a poignant moment because the royal family had been under intense media scrutiny for all the wrong reasons.
The king's son-in-law, Inaki Urdangarin, is a suspect in a corruption case, accused of having used his position to embezzle several million euros in public contracts through a supposedly not-for-profit foundation he'd set up.
Over Easter, the king's 13-year-old grandson, Felipe Juan Froilan, shot himself in the foot with a shotgun, even though Spanish law dictates you must be 14 to handle a gun.
The king on Tuesday decided to take a pay cut in solidarity with civil servants who are to lose their traditional Christmas bonuses as part of the government's most recent austerity drive.
The salaries of Juan Carlos and Crown Prince Felipe will be reduced about 7 percent ? to about 272,000 euros ($334,000) and 131,000 euros ($160,000) respectively ? in line with government policy, the Royal Palace said.
The king and prince acted voluntarily in cutting their salaries, the palace said.
Associated Pressbreaking dawn part 2 trailer mississippi state chris carpenter chris carpenter dick cheney hcg drops reason rally
You know that a scientific idea has penetrated popular culture when people start making jokes about it. Like the one about the priest who changed his name to Higgs so he could be better at giving mass. Or some that say a gadget for negating the Higgs field would be a weapon of mass destruction. Most are variants on a Higgs boson walks into a bar ? finally.
Such jokes celebrated the Fourth of July announcement of a new subatomic particle, detected amid the debris of proton-proton collisions at a powerful atom smasher in Europe known as the Large Hadron Collider. Headlines worldwide proclaimed success in creating the Higgs boson, the only missing member on the roster of the universe?s basic building blocks.
In terms usually reserved for athletic achievements, news reports described the finding as a monumental milestone in the history of science. The Higgs confers mass on other particles, makes atoms and molecules possible, and deepens humankind?s understanding of the cosmos, media consumers learned. Most of that hype was roughly true (sometimes very roughly). But in the wake of Higgs hysteria, some nuances were washed away with the deluge of atom-smashing euphoria.
One subtlety, for instance, concerns whether the particle discovered actually is ?the? Higgs boson, rather than perhaps just ?a? Higgs boson. And it?s a shortcut to say the Higgs particle gives mass to other particles ? it?s really the ?Higgs field,? the underlying stuff the boson is created from, that makes other particles massive. In any case, the Higgs is certainly not responsible for all mass. Most of the mass of protons and neutrons, for instance, derives from the energetic interaction of quarks and the gluons that hold them together.
Yet while some of the hype was exaggerated, many aspects of the Higgs real value to science and society went un- or understated. It?s quite fair to say that the Higgs field makes the universe the way it is, with material structure and all the complexities of biology. Add its significance for understanding the secrets of the cosmos and its illustration of the value of science, and the discovery of the Higgs particle, along with the search itself, has contributed value to society that?s difficult to overstate.
ID test
Whether the Higgs discovery itself was overstated hinges on a distinction between reasonable inference and scientific caution. ?As a layman I would say we have it,? says Rolf-Dieter Heuer, director general of the CERN physics laboratory that operates the LHC. ?But as a scientist I can only say what do we have.? What we have announced is the discovery of a new particle which is consistent with the Higgs boson.?
In fact, most experts seem to believe it most likely is the boson that Peter Higgs predicted in 1964. ?It?s almost certainly the case that that boson was made at CERN,? University of Oxford physicist Frank Close said in a talk July 16 in Dublin at the Euroscience Open Forum 2012 conference.
After all, particle accelerator searches over the last two decades had narrowed the range of possible masses for the Higgs; if it existed at all, it had to weigh in at between 114 billion and 143 billion electron volts or GeV (1 GeV is slightly more than the mass of a hydrogen atom).? So when two LHC experiments both spotted a boson weighing 125-126 GeV, inferring it to be the Higgs seemed reasonable. It was like Thoreau?s comment that finding a trout in the milk is strong evidence that the milk has been diluted by river water.
In the Higgs case, its discoverers can say for sure that they?ve found a trout, but DNA tests will be needed to confirm that it?s the right species.
That it?s a trout ? well, boson ? is certain. A boson is defined by specific quantum properties; in the interplay of nature?s particles, bosons are typically transmitters of forces. In LHC collisions, a surefire signature of a boson is the appearance of two photons after a collision, the end products of one of the several ways that the unstable Higgs can decay. Evidence of such two-photon decay established the particle?s boson status indisputably.
?We know there?s a new particle, we know it is a boson,? Heuer told reporters in Dublin during ESOF. ?But we don?t know if we can say Higgs boson. It looks very much like the Higgs, but scientists are sometimes very careful and very cautious.?
In principle there could be an impostor. Theorists have constructed a standard set of equations that describe all of nature?s particles and forces (except gravity) with extraordinary precision; a Higgs boson with very specific properties is necessary for this standard model to hold together mathematically. But as all physicists know, the standard model doesn?t explain everything ? it accounts for less than 20 percent of the matter in the universe, for instance ? the rest is invisible or ?dark? and cannot be made of the ordinary matter particles found on Earth. Theoretical efforts to describe new types of ?dark matter? particles imply that the standard model?s Higgs could have several cousins.
?If it?s not quite the standard model Higgs boson?that means if its properties are slightly different to the one which it needs to have for the standard model Higgs boson?that could indicate physics beyond the standard model,? says Heuer. ?Only once we understand how it behaves, we know if it?s the Higgs boson or not.? If it?s not, then it is maybe one of a family of Higgs bosons.?
Theorists have considered other possible particles that could mimic the Higgs in collider experiments. But most of those can already be ruled out by the LHC results, physicists Ian Low, Joseph Lykken and Gabe Shaughnessy point out in a paper online at arXiv.org (arxiv.org/abs/1207.1093). One impostor remains possible, but the researchers write that the standard Higgs boson ?gives a slightly better overall fit? to the LHC data. Another analysis reached a similar conclusion: ?We find that the current Higgs data are consistent with the Standard Model Higgs boson,? Dean Carmi of Tel Aviv University and collaborators reported online July 9 at arXiv.org (arxiv.org/abs/1207.1718).
?Consistent with,? isn?t the same as identification with certainty, but in this case it?s like looking for your best friend, in a place where you would expect him to be, and seeing someone there that looks just like him. It?s a reasonable inference that you?ve found your friend. But as Heuer notes, a cautious scientist will point out that your friend may have a twin, and you?ll need to look closer for a scar or some other identifying feature to be sure.
In the Higgs case, one such feature would be the particle?s spin. Bosons are permitted various amounts of spin, a quantum quantity roughly analogous to the angular momentum of an ordinary-sized rotating object. But the standard model?s Higgs particle would be spinless ? spin 0. That means the field it originates from is scalar ? without direction. Other common fields in nature, such as the electromagnetic field, are vectors, with both a strength and a direction in which the force acts. Heuer offered an analogy comparing the vector flow of a river with the still water of a swimming pool.
?If you swim in a river, the force of the water is always different on you depending on which direction you swim,? he said. ?The force of the water in a large swimming pool when you swim is always the same in any direction, and that?s a scalar. In all directions the same.?
While scalar fields are widely used by theorists in contemplating cosmic phenomena, no experiment has been able to detect one. ?If it?s a scalar,? says Heuer, ?that would be the first fundamental scalar ever discovered.?
If the new particle truly is the Higgs, its verification of real scalar fields would be nearly as important as its role in generating mass.?
Mass confusion
In fact, the Higgs? mass-generating job is very important. Without the Higgs, nobody would be around to search for it anyway. ?Because then, fundamental particles would not have mass,? notes Heuer, ?and then it?s difficult to get them together because they would all fly around at the velocity of light.?
But the Higgs? role in making mass is often imprecisely described. It?s not really the Higgs boson that confers mass on other particles, but the field of force from which the boson is made. Particles that interact with the Higgs field acquire mass because the field resists change in their state of motion; such resistance is inertia, the hallmark of mass.
As originally described by Higgs in 1964, that field could form in the early universe in a symmetry-breaking process similar to the sudden appearance of superconductivity in metals cooled below a certain critical temperature. In this process, some particles ? those responsible for the weak nuclear force ? would acquire mass, while photons (particles of light) would remain massless. Others published similar work in the same year (and in a different context, the same idea had been described by Philip Anderson in 1958). But Higgs went one step further, noting that his theory implied the existence of a new scalar boson. In 1967, Steven Weinberg applied the Higgs idea to the unification of the weak force with electromagnetism; he showed how the Higgs mechanism could cause the two forces ? indistinguishable at the universe?s birth ? to split into the versions observed today. Weinberg also showed that the Higgs field could confer mass on matter particles, such as quarks and electrons (but exactly how that mass-giving process would work remains mysterious).
Even if quarks and electrons would be massless without the Higgs field, that?s not the same thing as saying all the mass observed in everyday life is due to the Higgs. Most ordinary-world mass is contained in protons and neutrons, the constituents of the atomic nucleus, which are in turn made of quarks. But quark mass from the Higgs field would contribute very little to a proton?s or neutron?s mass. More than 95 percent is generated from quark interactions with gluons, the particles that hold quarks (and the nucleus itself) together, as Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek points out in a recent paper (arxiv.org/abs/1206.7114).
Of course, that realization doesn?t diminish the Higgs importance; it only clarifies it. And the Higgs is entirely responsible for the mass of some particles, notably the W and Z bosons that transmit the weak nuclear force. That force plays a key role in the nuclear reactions that power the sun. Fortunately for life on Earth, fusion reactions providing the sun?s energy proceed fairly slowly. Consequently the sun is still glowing strong after nearly 5 billion years, providing life plenty of time to evolve. As Close of Oxford points out, the sun?s leisurely pace depends on the weak force being weak, and it is only weak because the W bosons that transmit it are massive.
?So the slow-burning sun is critical for our existence,? says Close, ?and the slow-burning sun is because the weak force is so feeble, and it?s feeble because the W boson is very massive, and the W boson is very massive because of all this Higgs business we?ve been talking about.?
Future matters
Besides illuminating the origin of mass, studying the Higgs has other implications for physics. For one thing, its reported mass is compatible with a popular theory for explaining the dark matter in space. Inspired by the mathematical symmetry of the standard model, theorists have proposed an analogous mathematical framework called supersymmetry. For each particle in the standard model, supersymmetry requires a partner particle, much more massive. Most such particles would have disintegrated in the universe?s earliest moments, but the lightest remaining superpartner should still be around in large quantities, accounting for the dark matter.
Understanding the Higgs field more deeply might also aid physicists in their quest to understand the universe?s beginning, when a brief burst of inflationary expansion planted the seeds for the galaxies decorating the cosmos today. That burst of expansion was supposedly caused by a scalar field in space, much like the Higgs field. In fact, some physicists have even proposed that the Higgs field itself might have been the inflation instigator. In any event, finally having a scalar particle to study should shed light on that universe-initiating event. It may even be that ?dark energy,? the mysterious force that even now drives the universe to expand at an accelerating rate, is itself a scalar field.
Beyond purely scientific rewards, the Higgs ? and the search for it ? benefits society in many ways already evident and others unforeseeable. CERN, of course, was the site of the invention of the World Wide Web, whose economic impact has already paid for all the atom smashers ever built. And deepening knowledge of the physical world has always in the past produced unforeseen future societal benefits. When James Clerk Maxwell predicted, and then Heinrich Hertz discovered, electromagnetic waves, nobody foresaw the economic consequences of television, microwave ovens and Wi-Fi. Particles of antimatter, discovered in cosmic rays, have found uses in medical imaging. Nobody knew at first that Einstein?s relativity theory would allow your car to tell you when to turn. Or that the mysterious math of quantum mechanics would empower lasers and computer chips, revolutionizing everything from grocery stores and music players to mass communication.
Of course, you won?t ever video chat with a Higgs-powered smartphone, and there certainly will be no ?bosonic bomb? based on the Higgs envisioned in Herman Wouk?s 2004 novel A Hole in Texas, about how the Chinese discovered the Higgs in cosmic rays. There?s no good business plan for a particle that shows up only about once for every trillion proton collisions.
But studying it will serve to satisfy the human quest to understand nature more deeply. Such deeper understanding always leads to more material advances, eventually.
And a deeper understanding of the laws of nature and the mysteries of the universe is precisely what the Higgs boson offers. It made the universe fit for human habitation, and now it may enable humans to comprehend their cosmic home more fully.
?The properties of this boson might open up a window into the DNA of the universe,? comments Heuer. No joke.
Source: http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/342408/title/Blog_Higgs_hysteria
the bachelor good morning america red meat bachelor ben jon hamm kim kardashian law school rankings jon hamm
The Leon County Tax Appraiser holds the data which contains all of the sale and property transfers in Tallahassee, and it is a wonderful resource.
But the Tallahassee Board Of Realtors Multiple Listing Service contains most of the sales and most of the homes for sale in Tallahassee, which means we can examine the balance of supply and demand.
It is this real estate supply and demand dynamic that best guides our forecasts, and this is why I so often write about ?months of supply? in the Tallahassee real estate market.
When we examine supply and demand in all the areas covered by the Tallahassee Board Of Realtors Multiple Listing Service, we find that things are slowly improving.
In the real estate graph above, the green line shows the annual trend of home sales, the red line records the average number of homes for sale, while the purple line plots the current months of supply on the right axis.
If we look at the left side of the graph, this is what ?good? or ?normal? is supposed to look like. Sales are far higher than listings, and the months of supply are around 6.
Then demand begins to rise in 2004 for various reasons, and the supply train notices and follows suit.
See how demand began to flatten in early 2005, but the supply side did not figure this out for several more years! So the additional building that occurred from 2005 through 2008 has over-built our market (roughly 14,500 too many homes were built during this period), and that is why our over-supply situation continues.
So even though the supply side is dropping (yeah!), the red line in the graph shows that it is still double the amount that we had before the boom of the housing market. Sadly, demand is no where near where it was prior to the run-up, and we know that it will take more time before it returns.
We continuously publish market information in order to help prevent this from happening again, and we hope that this vigilance will bring about equilibrium sooner to the Tallahassee real estate market.
Our understanding of supply and demand in the Tallahassee Board Of Realtors Multiple Listing Service is the reason that our advice has been so effective at selling homes over the past five years.
If you are thinking about selling your home or perhaps wondering what opportunities for selling your home and buying right now (to take advantage of sub 4% interest rates), you can drop me a note to schedule a time to discuss your specific situation and needs.
We will review how your home compares to others in the Tallahassee Board Of Realtors Multiple Listing Service and give you the best advice for what you would like to accomplish.
school closings top chef texas rail gun harrisburg great pacific garbage patch ben affleck and jennifer garner google privacy changes
